The Pain You Cannot Avoid And The Pain You Can

IT IS THREE IN THE MORNING and you are awake.

You did not choose this. You went to bed at a reasonable hour like a reasonable person, and now the ceiling is up there in the dark and you are down here looking at it. Your body is tired. Your mind is not. Your mind is holding a meeting.

The meeting has one item on the agenda. Maybe it is money. Maybe it is the thing you said at dinner, or the thing they said back. Maybe it is the scan on Thursday, or the silence from someone who used to call, or a sentence in an email that you have now read forty times. Whatever it is, your mind is turning it over the way a tongue keeps returning to a broken tooth. It has been turning it over for an hour. Nothing new has been discovered in that hour. Nothing new will be discovered in the next one. And still the meeting goes on, because the meeting is not really trying to discover anything. The meeting is arguing.

This should not be happening. She should not have said that. I should have seen it coming. It has to be different than it is. I cannot do this again. Something is wrong, and by now the wrongness is not only in the situation. The wrongness has soaked into the night itself, into the ceiling, into the bare fact of being you.

Stay in that bed for one more minute. Everything this book has to say is already present in it.

Two things are happening at three in the morning. They feel like one thing. They are not.

The first thing is whatever is actually the case. The bank balance is a number. The scan is on Thursday. The person has not called. The words at dinner were said, and they cannot be unsaid. Along with the facts there may be feeling in the body. A tight band across the chest. A hollow place in the stomach. Heat behind the face. All of that is real. None of it is imaginary. It is what happens. Call it pain.

The second thing is the meeting. The commentary. The prosecutor and the defense attorney taking turns. The replay of what was said and the rehearsal of what will be said. The endless should and should not. The insistence, running underneath everything like a generator in the basement, that this must not be what it is. That second thing is not what happens. It is the argument with what happens. Call it suffering.

Pain is what happens. Suffering is the argument with what happens.

That one sentence is the whole book. Everything that follows is a way of checking it, from one angle after another, in the actual rooms of your actual life, until you can see it for yourself without anyone’s help. Because here is the first promise, and it will be kept on every page: you will never be asked to believe anything. Belief is cheap and it does not hold at three in the morning. You will only be asked to look. If you look and it is not true, throw the book away. It will have earned that. But if you look and it is true, then something enormous follows from it, and the rest of these pages exist to walk you through what follows.

Start with the difference itself, because at first it sounds like a word game. It is not a word game. It is the most practical distinction you will ever make.

Think of the last time you sat in a hospital waiting room. Not for yourself. For someone you love. The chairs are bolted together. The television in the corner is playing something no one is watching. Somewhere behind the double doors, a person who matters to you is being looked at by strangers.

There is pain in that room, and it is honest pain. Fear has a taste, and you can taste it. Love has a weight when it is frightened, and you can feel the weight sitting on your chest. If you have ever been in that room, you know that this part, the raw part, comes in waves, and that between the waves there are strange pockets of quiet where you notice the carpet or the coffee machine and feel almost normal, and then feel guilty for feeling normal.

Now notice the other thing that was in the room with you. The voice that would not stop. If I had made her go to the doctor in the spring. Why did I let him drive. What if it is the bad kind. What will I do, what will I possibly do. I cannot handle this. This cannot be happening. That voice was not the fear. It was riding on the fear. It was arguing with a scan result that did not exist yet, negotiating with doctors who had not spoken yet, living in a future that no one had confirmed. And it hurt. It hurt worse than the fear underneath it, and unlike the fear, it never came in waves and never offered a pocket of quiet. The argument does not rest, because the argument is not a feeling. It is a position. Positions have to be maintained.

The fear was pain. The voice was suffering. And here is what you may never have noticed, because they were braided together so tightly: they are not the same thing, they do not behave the same way, and one of them is optional.

By now a fair question has appeared, and it is the right one. If there are two things in that room, and one of them is doing most of the damage, how have you managed to live an entire life without ever telling them apart?

Three reasons, and not one of them is stupidity.

The first is that they arrive at the same instant. There is no gap. The fear rises and the commentary is already talking, in the same breath, the way thunder seems to belong to the lightning. Nothing announces a change of speaker. You do not hear the fact, pause, and then hear the case against the fact. You hear one continuous noise, and you have spent your whole life calling that noise how I feel.

The second is the grammar. The argument speaks in the first person. It does not announce that a commentary is now running. It says I. I cannot do this. I should have known. I am not going to survive this. Anything that says I with enough conviction gets taken for you, and so the commentary has enjoyed, for decades, the perfect immunity of a thing nobody suspected, because everybody assumed it was themselves.

The third is simply that no one told you. You were taught a great many true and useful things by people who meant you well. You were not taught that the noise in your head at three in the morning is made of two different materials. It is not on the curriculum anywhere. A distinction that has never once been drawn for you is not a distinction you failed to make. It is one you were never in a position to make.

Then hold the two side by side and watch how differently they behave, because behavior is how you will tell them apart out in the field, when the words are gone.

Pain is an event. Events have edges. A wave of grief rises, crests, and passes, and if you have ever been ambushed by one in a grocery store you know that it does not last, that four minutes later you are somehow reading the label on a jar and feeling almost nothing. Fear does the same. Even the fear in the waiting room came in waves, with those strange pockets of quiet between them. This is not offered as a consolation. The waves keep coming, and some of them are enormous. But each one, taken by itself, has a beginning and an end, because a sensation is a thing that is happening, and everything that happens also stops happening.

Suffering is not an event. It is a position, and a position is a thing you hold. This is why it does not come in waves. It never needs to rest, because it is not doing anything. It is refusing. It is the flat standing insistence that reality is currently in violation, filed and refiled and never once withdrawn, and it can be held for a decade at a low cost per minute and a ruinous cost per year.

Which is the whole reason any of this is worth a book. If your suffering were pain, there would be nothing to do but bear it, and you would bear it, because people bear pain far better than they believe they can. But most of what has been wearing you down is not the wave. It is the position you have been holding against the wave. And a position, unlike a wave, is something a person can put down.

The waiting room is a large example. The distinction holds at every size, and it is worth watching it hold at a small one, because most of a life is made of small ones.

You sent a text. It mattered more than it looked like it mattered, and you knew that when you sent it. Now it is nine at night and there has been no reply. The phone is face down on the couch, which is a position you put it in on purpose, to prove something to yourself, and you have picked it up four times anyway.

What is actually the case? A message was sent. A reply has not come. In the body, something that feels like a small cold stone just under the ribs. That is the whole inventory. That is the pain, and notice that it is not nothing, but notice also its actual size. A stone under the ribs. Waiting.

Now the rest of it. They saw it and they are deciding how to let me down. I came on too strong, I always do this. Or, they are with someone. Or, something happened, what if something happened. I should not have sent it. I should send another one. I should never have started caring in the first place, this is what caring gets you. By nine thirty the silence of one person has become a verdict on your whole history of reaching for people. The stone under the ribs did not do that. The stone is just sitting there, being a stone. Everything else was built on top of it, in an evening, by the argument, out of nothing but should and what if.

Then the phone buzzes. Sorry, was at my mom’s, phone was dead. And the entire courthouse, the trial, the verdict, the sentence, evaporates in one second, which tells you exactly how much of it was ever made of anything.

Take one more case, and take it where the distinction seems least likely to survive, because a distinction is only worth having if it holds where you would bet against it. Take a pain that is not emotional at all.

Something has gone wrong in your lower back. It went wrong on Saturday, lifting a thing you have lifted a hundred times, and now it is Tuesday night and you are lying very still, because still is the only position that does not send the white line down your leg.

Look at what is actually there. There is a band of hot pressure somewhere above the hip. It has a location, and if you attend to it honestly, the location is smaller than your fear of it. It has a shape. And it changes, which you would not have guessed from the way you talk about it, because you have been calling it a solid thing lasting three days. It is not solid. It swells and recedes. There are seconds in the middle of the bad night where it is almost nothing, and then it climbs again. That is the pain. It is real, it is unpleasant, and it is happening in an area roughly the size of your hand.

Now listen to the rest of the room. What if this is permanent. I am thirty eight years old. Is this the rest of my life. I should have gone to the gym, I should not have lifted that, what is wrong with me. Everyone else my age is fine. If I cannot work, then what happens to us. And underneath all of it, running like a generator in the basement: this should not be happening to me.

Not one of those sentences is in your back. Every one of them is in the room, and the room is dark, and they are louder than the pain and they last longer, because the pain, being a sensation, cannot help changing, and the sentences, being a position, do not have to.

Then watch what happens when someone you trust says, with authority, this is a muscle, it will take ten days, you will be completely fine. The band of hot pressure above your hip does not change by one degree. The night changes completely. Nothing was done to the pain. Something was done to the argument, and almost all of what you had been calling the pain went with it.

Not optional the way a gym membership is optional, something you cancel with willpower. Optional in a stranger way, which this book will take its time with. But before any of that, the distinction has to be tested against harder cases, because right now a fair voice in you is saying: fine, my three in the morning spiral is partly self made, I will give you that. But some things are just terrible. Do not tell me my divorce was a word game. Do not tell me grief is an argument.

Good. Keep that voice. It is the most important voice in this book, and it will get its own sections, stated in its own words, because it deserves better than to be talked over. For now, here is a first answer.

Nothing in these pages will ever tell you that your divorce did not happen, that the diagnosis is not real, that the person you buried is somehow not gone. This is not that kind of book. The world is exactly as real as it seems. The loss is real. The tumor is real. The empty chair at the table is real. When the argument with life finally quiets down, the facts do not change and nobody is asking them to. What changes is something else, something that was added to the facts so early and so constantly that you have never once seen a fact without it.

Here is the addition. In every moment of suffering you have ever had, without a single exception, there was a felt sense of a me over here and a life over there, and the life over there was doing something to the me over here. Life the perpetrator. You the recipient. A hand and a slap, and you were always under the hand.

Feel how familiar that is. It is so familiar it does not seem like a description of anything. It seems like the plain truth of the situation. Of course there is a me here and a world out there. What else could there be?

That split is the ground the argument stands on. You cannot argue with your life unless you are standing apart from it. There have to be two parties for a dispute. The moment there is a me over here and a what happened over there, the courtroom is open, and the case never closes, because the past will not change its testimony and the future will not take the stand.

So this book makes a claim, and makes it early so you can hold it against everything that follows. The claim is not that your pain is imaginary. The claim is that the split is. The divorce is real. The division between you and your life is not. The grief is real. The gap it supposedly has to cross to reach you is not. Only the division is imagined. The world is not.

If that sentence sounds strange, good. It should sound strange. It is not the kind of sentence you can evaluate by thinking about it, any more than you can evaluate a chair by thinking about it. You have to sit down. The middle of this book is nothing but sitting down. It will not ask you to adopt a philosophy. It will ask you to look, in your own direct experience, right where you are, for the me that life is supposedly happening to, and to be scrupulously honest about what you actually find. Not what you have always assumed. What you find.

People do this looking and the results are consistent enough to be worth a book. What they find is not that they do not exist. Nobody is going to tell you that you do not exist, and if anyone ever does, check your wallet. What they find is stranger and gentler than that. They find that the me that was supposedly cowering over here, separate from life, receiving its blows, is not where they thought it was, and not what they thought it was, and that when it is not being imagined, the blows land differently. The pain still lands. It lands in something wider than a target. And the argument, with nowhere left to stand, begins, sometimes slowly and sometimes all at once, to fall silent.

What remains when it falls silent is not blankness. This matters, so it is worth saying before anything else gets said. There is a version of this teaching, and you may have brushed against it in a book or a video, that sounds like a shrug. Nothing matters, nobody is here, all is illusion, so relax. That version is not freedom. That version is numbness wearing freedom’s clothes, and if this book ever starts to sound like it, it has failed. What actually remains when the argument stops is the opposite of a shrug. The waiting room is still the waiting room. The love still has weight. The tears, if they come, come cleaner, because they are not fighting their way through a protest. You do not care less about your life when you stop arguing with it. You finally get to care about it directly, without the static.

One more honest thing, and then the chapter can do its work.

You have already tried to stop suffering. You would not be holding this book otherwise. You have tried fixing the circumstances, and some of them got fixed, and the suffering found the new circumstances within the month. You have tried thinking differently, gratitude and reframing and self talk, and it worked while you gripped it and stopped when your grip tired. You may have tried numbing it, in one of the hundred respectable ways or one of the disreputable ones, and it worked, honestly worked, for an evening at a time, and the bill always came. You may have tried understanding it, years of understanding it, and you can now give a beautiful account of your own pain, and the account has not stopped the pain. Perhaps you even tried transcending it, and touched something in a class or on a retreat or alone one October morning, something that felt like the answer, and then it faded in the parking lot like they all do.

None of that was wasted, and none of it was foolish. But notice that every one of those attempts worked on the same side of the problem. Each one tried to change what happens, or change your thoughts about what happens, or dull your receipt of what happens. Not one of them ever examined the split itself, the me over here and the life over there, the two parties that make the argument possible. That is the one stone that has never been turned over. It is the stone this book exists to turn over.

So here is where things stand at the end of the first chapter. There is pain, and there is the argument with pain. The pain in your life is real and this book will treat it with respect, all of it, the ordinary Tuesday kind and the kind that rearranges a whole life. The argument is also real in the sense that it is really happening, really exhausting, really running your nights. But the argument rests entirely on a single assumption that you have never checked. You are about to check it. Not tonight, and not by force. Chapter by chapter, in small honest looks, with every objection you raise treated as a serious question rather than a symptom.

Nothing will be asked of you that takes longer than a minute. Nothing will require a cushion, a posture, a teacher, or a single word of vocabulary you did not already know in the eighth grade. The whole method fits in three words, and the three words will close every chapter in this book.

LOOKANDSEE Do not wait for the right conditions. Use whatever is bothering you today, this week, right now. It does not need to be dramatic. A tension with someone at work will do. A bill will do. The dishes will do.

Bring the situation to mind, and then, for about thirty seconds, try to sort what you find into two piles. In the first pile, put only what is actually the case. The facts a camera would record, and the raw sensations in your body right now, the tightness, the heaviness, the buzz, wherever they live. In the second pile, put everything your mind says about it. Every should, every why, every what if, every replay, every rehearsal, every this cannot go on.

Do not try to change either pile. Do not try to make the second pile stop. Just look at the two piles side by side and notice one thing: they are not the same size. Notice which pile is bigger. Notice which pile hurts more. That is all. You have just seen, with your own eyes, the difference between pain and suffering, and no one had to convince you of anything.

The whole book, free: PDF or EPUB. Or the full contents.